Skip to main content

lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay

 delay of 496 days in filing the appeal condoned

 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI ‘G’ BENCH 
BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI RAJENDRA, AM
 ITA No. 5994/Mum/2010 – (Asst Year 2005-06) 

Shri Y P Trivedi
 Vs 
The Jt Commr of Income Tax Range 11(3), Mumbai 

 Dt.of hearing - 3rd July 2012 
Dt of pronouncement - 11th July 2012
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM 

            There is a delay of 496 days in filing the present appeal. The assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay as well as affidavit of assessee and his Chartered Accountant Mr Sunil Hirawat explaining the reasons for delay in filing the present appeal.4 We have heard the learned A.R of the assessee as well as the learned DR and considered the relevant material on record for condonation of delay. The learned A.R of the assessee has submitted that after receiving the order of the learned CIT(A) by the Chartered Accountant of the assessee, the same was given to one Shri Shri Balakrishna Mohite, who is maintaining the records of appeal matters for taking the photo copy and sending to the assessee:s office for filing appeal. However, inadvertently the impugned order of CIT(A) got mixed up with the other papers in the office of Chartered Accountant of the assessee and therefore, the appeal could not be filed within the period of limitation. Subsequently, Shri Bakrishna Mohite came across to the impugned order and realise that the appeal against the said order could not be filed. Accordingly, the present appeal was immediately filed after the tracing out of the said order. 

After considering the rival submissions and carefully gone through the affidavit filed by the assessee as well as the affidavit of Shri Sunil Hirawat, CA of the assessee, we note that the facts of the case do not suggest that the assessee has acted in a malafide manner or the reasons explained is only a device to cover an ulterior purpose. It is settled proposition of law that the Court should take a lenient view on the matter of condonation of delay. However, the explanation and the reason for delay must be bonafide and not merely a device to cover an ulterior purpose or an attempt to save limitation in an underhand way. The Court should be liberal in construing the sufficient cause and should lean in favour of such party. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The B N S structure

 The BNS comprises 20 chapters and 358 sections. Its structure is similar to that of the IPC. The outline of the Sanhita is as follows:[ Chapters Clauses Classification of Offences Chapter 1 Clauses 1 to 3 Preliminary Chapter 2 Clauses 4 to 13 Of Punishments Chapter 3 Clauses 14 to 44 General Exceptions   of the Right to Private Defence (sections 34 to 44) Chapter 4 Clauses 45 to 62 Of Abetment, Criminal Conspiracy and Attempt Chapter 5 Clauses 63 to 99 Of Offences against Women and Children Of Sexual Offences (63 to 73) Of criminal force and assault against women (74 to 79) Of Offences relating to marriage (80 to 87) Of causing miscarriage, etc. (88 to 99) Chapter 6 Clauses 100 to 144 Of Offences Affecting the Human Body Of Offences Affecting Life (100 to 113) Of Hurt (114 to 125) Of wrongful restraint and wrongful confinement (126 to 136) Of Kidnapping, Abduction, Slavery and Forced Labour (137 to 146) Chapter 7 Clauses 147 to 158 Of Offences Against the State Chapter 8...

Criminal Jurisprudence and the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita Act 2023 in Kashmir Context Introduction to Criminal Jurisprudence

  Criminal jurisprudence is the body of law that relates to crime and the administration of justice. It encompasses various principles and rules that govern the determination of criminal responsibility and the rights of individuals within the criminal justice system. At its core, criminal jurisprudence aims to balance the need for public safety with the rights of individuals to fair treatment and due process. Key principles include the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial, the right to legal representation, and the prohibition of arbitrary detention. #### Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita Act 2023: An Overview The Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita Act 2023 represents a significant overhaul of India's criminal laws, intending to modernize and streamline the criminal justice system. This Act replaces the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), Indian Evidence Act, and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). Its objectives include simplifying legal provisions, making them more comprehensible to...

The property taken over by government without any valid legal contract with caretaker trustee cannot be compensated. Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

The judgment in LPA No. 228/2025 (Ms. Sabiya Tariq v. UT of J&K & Others) arises from a long-standing dispute over the management and control of the Kashmir Nursing Home, which was earlier managed by the Sher-i-Kashmir National Medical Institute Trust. This litigation marks the second round, following an earlier judgment in 2005 that upheld the government's action of taking over possession of the Nursing Home and dismissed the writ petition from the Trust and related parties. ### Background and Core Issues - The central issue revolves around the legality of the government's 2003 order taking over the Kashmir Nursing Home. The Trust (respondent no. 2) originally operated the Nursing Home but was found unable to run it effectively, lacking the necessary expertise, staff, and resources. - The previous litigation involved conflicting opinions within a Division Bench, and the matter was resolved by the Chief Justice, who dismissed the petition and validated the government...